FDD Bloggers

Blog Editors

  • Mary Beth Nalin
    Communications Coordinator

FDD PROJECTS

Newsletters

« Notes and Comments (CM) | Main | Crisis in Burma (RWC) »

May 06, 2008

Food vs. fuel a global myth

Writing in the Chicago Tribune, FDD Senior Fellow Dr. Robert Zubrin and Gal Luft, executive director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, address the myths and facts surrounding the issue of biofuels.

In recent weeks, a flood of reports and statements has claimed that the world's biofuel programs—in particular the U.S. corn ethanol effort—is starving poor people around the globe. Even the UN's special rapporteur for the Right to Food decried biofuel production as "a crime against humanity."

It seems so obvious: With so much corn being turned into fuel, food shortages must inevitably result, and biofuel programs must be the cause. However, that's completely untrue.

Here are the facts. In the last five years, despite the nearly threefold growth of the corn ethanol industry (or actually because of it), the U.S. corn crop grew by 35 percent, the production of distillers grain (a high-value animal feed made from the protein saved from the corn used for ethanol) quadrupled and the net corn food and feed product of the U.S. increased 26 percent.

Contrary to claims that farmers have cut other crops to grow more corn, U.S. soybean plantings this year are expected to be up 18 percent and wheat plantings up 6 percent. U.S. farm exports are up 23 percent.

America is clearly doing its share in feeding the world.

 

Agriculture is not a zero-sum game. There are 800 million acres of farmland in the U.S., and only about 30 percent of it is actually being used to grow anything. As a result of the ethanol program, the corn price received by farmers doubled over the last five years, causing a huge increase in the amount grown in terms of acreage and yield.

The increased demand for food from the hundreds of millions of people in China and India rising out of poverty and moving to a more calorie-rich diet affects the price of food the most. Second is the price of fuel.

Higher fuel prices increase the cost of production, transport, wages and packaging, the main cost of retail food. For example, a $3 box of cornflakes contains 15 ounces of corn that cost 8 cents when bought from the farmer. So, farm commodity prices have almost no effect on retail prices. But the effect of oil price increases can be huge.

Which brings us to the real culprit: the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. This year, with OPEC-rigged oil prices exceeding $100 a barrel, the U.S. will pay $800 billion for its oil supply, and the world as a whole will pay $3.2 trillion. These figures are both up a factor of 10 from what they were in 1999 and represent a huge regressive tax on the world economy.

In this, biofuels have done more good than damage to the poor.

According to Merrill Lynch analysts, without biofuel programs, the price of oil would be about $13 a barrel higher than it now is. A $13 savings for each barrel could save the U.S. $65 billion in foreign oil payments.

So, rather than shut down biofuel programs, we need to radically augment them, to the point where we can take down the oil cartel. Congress can make this happen by passing a law requiring that all new cars sold in the U.S. be flex-fuel vehicles that can run on any combination of gasoline, ethanol or methanol. The technology costs only about $100 per vehicle.

By making America a flex-fuel vehicle market, we will effectively make flex-fuel the international standard. Around the world, gasoline would be forced to compete against alcohol fuels made from a number of sources, including not only commercial crops such as corn and sugar, but cellulosic ethanol made from crop residues and weeds, as well as methanol made from any kind of biomass, coal, natural gas and recycled urban trash. By creating such a fuel market, we can enormously expand and diversify humanity's fuel resource base, protecting all nations from continued economic bleeding and, indeed, in some cases, starvation. That, and not blindly accepting the naysayers' propaganda demanding the preservation of the oil monopoly, should be our course.

Robert Zubrin is the author of "Energy Victory: Winning the War on Terror by Breaking Free of Oil." Gal Luft is executive director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security. They are members of the Set America Free Coalition.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/285626/28807930

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Food vs. fuel a global myth:

Comments

Biofuels are still a waste of food period. Fuel made from US corn was supposed to ease our foriegn oil dependancy. it hasn't. It was supposed to be better for the environment, it's not.

When a nation chooses to burn it's food instead of drilling for an abundant natural resource. That nation plays the fool.

Flex Fuel is a lower octane than regular gas, the engine burns more fuel, hence, more fill-ups and less BANG for your buck!

Fuel prices are up in Iowa. Food prices are up. Now it appears the favorite whipping boy is ethanol to take the blame. The word is out, we are using food for fuel in America and we should be ashamed of ourselves as the story goes. And it is the tall corn state, Iowa, and its people, you and I, which are being mistakenly focused upon as nasty and ultimately evil because Iowa is contributing to making children starve around the world because “our” corn is not being used as food -- instead it is being used to fuel gas-guzzling SUVs. That argument is completely bogus in my humble opinion. And so are most all other arguments made against ethanol likewise bogus.

Ethanol does not consume food for fuel, but, instead, refining corn in the fermentation process actually extends the world food supply. The fermentation process makes corn more digestible for ruminant animals, so you need to feed them less, thus increasing the available supply. How much of an increase in the world food supply? Refining 3 billion bushels or 25% of the 2007 American corn crop to begin to meet the goal to make America energy independent under the present federal Energy Act signed into law will not take 3 billion bushels of corn away from the world food supply in year 2008. Instead it will actually add the equivalent of an additional 300 million bushels of corn to the world food supply! That is enough corn to fill 375,000 semi grain trucks (800 bushel capacity, 65 feet long each) lined up bumper to bumper all the way from the beach in Atlantic City, New Jersey, to the beach in Santa Barbara, California, and then half again back across this great land to the Four Corners in Osceola, Iowa, 4,616 miles!

To see how the above was arrived at there is an article posted on www.libertytruth.org, and once to the web site click on the Old Codger’s blog. What you read you might call thinking outside the box, but where is the law that says we must all think inside the box? Who built the box in the first place? For what reason is there a box? To keep us contained? The purpose for that web-posting is for people to direct all those they know that are running for public office, local, state and federal in this election year to read it also so when they take office they will be better informed and more likely to promote a vital industry in this country to move us toward energy independence, along with feeding the hungry.

Post a comment