FDD

The New Lexicon (RWC)

I had an email the other day from my friend Buck Revel, the former top FBI official. 

Buck spent 30 years in the Bureau.  It was a remarkable career.  Among other things he ran all Criminal Investigations, as well as Counter-Terrorism and Counter-Intelligence.

He was furious about a dumb move by the current administration.  It is this:

The US government is quietly dropping the words “jihad” and any reference to “radical Islam” or the word “Islam” in public statements by its officials when they talk about terrorism.  They also do not want the word “liberty”, referring to a social and political condition, used as something the people of a country can aspire to.  They don’t want to offend Muslims.

This Orwellian news originally came from Steve Emerson at the Investigative Project who has backed it up with documents from Homeland Security, the State Department and the National Counterterrorism Center. He sent them to Buck Revel and me and many others.

One of the documents is titled “Words that Work and Words that Don’t –a Guide for Counterterrorism Communication.

Another of the documents, slugged For Official Use Only, is titled “Terminology to Define the Terrorists: Recommendations from American Muslims.”

The Department of Homeland Security refuses to identify the "influential Muslims” and "leading U.S.-based scholars and commentators on Islam" who met with Secretary Michael Chertoff and influenced this new, politically correct and flaccid approach to terrorists and what drives them.

I can tell you what drives the radical Islamists.  It’s no secret. In fact. The terrorists will tell you themselves since now the US government can’t: religion and ideology, although the new official American policy is to pretend otherwise.

So America, says Steve Emerson, after serving for more than two centuries as the sanctuary for huddled masses yearning to breathe free, is being asked to be verbally respectful to fanatics bent on a global religious state.

The memos –a particularly loony one come from Homeland Security’s “Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties,” don’t offer examples to show where Islam and secular democracy have reinforced each other, or explain how Sharia law, the imposition of religion into state affairs, is "fully compatible" with secular democracy, but that is the line they are pushing with the US government. Ridiculous and stupid.

Iran still developing nuclear weapons (RWC)

Iran will likely have the means to produce nuclear weapons before the end of this year, says Israeli Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz.

Mofaz is a former Israeli Defense Minister and was once chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Force.

He said, at a speech at Yale University, that Iran could possibly build nuclear arms within months.

He also said that any means of ensuring that Iran does not acquire nuclear weapons are valid.

“Israel will not tolerate a nuclear Iran, and I'd like to believe that the rest of the world will not allow it to happen.” 

“All is fair in the efforts to make sure it doesn't."

He said the "Iranian regime is the number one threat to mankind in the 21st century.

“It is a multi-dimensional, multi-armed threat, which increases every day, every hour."

Ahmadinejad and Israeli's 60th Anniversary (RWC)

The mouthy Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has once again said that Israel will "be soon swept away."

It is the second time in the last couple of years that the Iranian president has predicted the eradication of the Jewish state.

Ahmadinejad seems to be playing with a shortage of marbles. He has recently claimed his country is being secretly led by the Islamic “Mahdi”, who has mysteriously returned across the centuries.  As I recall, he is to make his appearance by popping out of a well.

About Israel’s 60th anniversary celebration, Ahmadinejad said last week:

"This terrorist and criminal state is backed by foreign powers, but it will soon be swept away by the Palestinians,"

“it would be futile to hold a birthday ceremony for something which is already dead."

The Iranian president said the anniversary celebrations can’t save this "rotten and stinking corpse." He meant Israel.

Ahmandinejad has said that the Jews in Israel should be sent to Europe or Alaska.

The US in Zimbabwe (RWC)

The US ambassador to Zimbabwe, who has been at his post for only six months, deserves his nation’s congratulations for a recent fierce display of guts and integrity. The State Department and the US Foreign Service should be proud.

Our diplomat’s name is Jim McGee. He has been the US envoy to Zimbabwe since November, replacing Ambassador Chris Bell who moved from the frying pan into the fire as our new ambassador to Afghanistan.

McGee, who is African-American, is 59 years old and has had a distinguished career.  He is from Chicago.  He flew in the Vietnam War for which he received three Distinguished Flying Crosses.  He has been posted over his long career in difficult posts in Nigeria and Pakistan.  He has been ambassador to Swaziland and then Madagascar and the Comoros Islands before his new job in Zimbabwe.

As you know, Zimbabwe has been falling apart for years.  President Robert Mugabe, the Marxist former schoolteacher, has practically destroyed the once rich and lovely country.  He acts as if the land and its people are his personal belongings.  Crazy Bob had held Zim in his gnarled fist for thirty years and has driven it into deprivation and misery.

Notes and Comments

BROUHAHA: What a curious quarrel: President Bush, in Israel, describes the policy of appeasement that led to World War II and the Holocaust, and Senator Barack Obama and his supporters take umbrage, claiming he has been viciously insulted.

Instead of protesting that Bush has implied that Obama would be soft on terrorist masters (because Obama has said he would meet - personally and without preconditions - with Iranian terrorist master Mahmoud Ahmadinejad even as Ahmadinejad's regime is killing Americans in Iraq, squashing freedom in Lebanon, developing nuclear weapons and threatening Israel with genocide), Obama might simply have said: "On this one point, Bush and I agree. I, too, would oppose a policy of appeasement. I, too, look not to Neville Chamberlain but to Winston Churchill as a model."

Politics aside (if we can manage that for a minute), the key issue is not whether you talk to terrorists, despots and tyrants. The issue is what you say - in particular (1) what you are willing to offer and (2) what you are prepared to threaten.

A president who doesn't know is a president who isn't ready to negotiate. A president should sit down with a sworn enemy only when it's clear that a deal - beneficial to our side - is not merely possible but imminent. Anything else is diplomatic malpractice that can only lead to diplomatic defeat.

Also, while everyone is by now familiar with Bush's controversial snippet, how many have taken the trouble to read the passage in context? Do so. It's below. Then decide whether you think these lines were "outrageous" (as Sen. Joe Biden said) or "disgraceful" (as Sen. John Kerry said) or "reckless and reprehensible" (as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said) or "beneath the dignity of the president" (as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said) or "a cheap political attack" (as DNC chairman Howard Dean said):

America's Counter-Intelligence Capabilities (RWC)

Finally, this tough but pointed note was sent to me by an active duty army officer I know.  He was commenting on America’s strained counter-intelligence capabilities which have always been poor, in some measure because we have a free and open society. It has a ring to it anyway,

“Robert Hansson wasn’t just a Soviet spy, he was an FBI Special Agent In Charge of FBI Soviet Counter Intelligence.

Aldrich Ames wasn’t just a Soviet spy, he was the CIA Officer in charge of CIA’s Soviet Counter Intelligence.

We don’t just get penetrated. We get bent over.”  OK, colonel.

Crime and the New Demographics of Europe (RWC)

The Washington Post recently did a long take-out about France and the crime problem with its Muslim citizens.  Molly Moore of the Post Foreign Service did the reporting. It was sympathetic to the problems of poverty and alienation among European Muslims but the facts that emerged were compelling.

Seventy per cent of all prisoners in France are Muslims, though Muslims comprise only 12 per cent of the French population.

Compare this to some other European countries. 

The Muslim crime problem is disproportionate to the population in all of them, but nothing compared to France.

In the UK, 11 per cent of prisoners are Muslims.  They make up 3 per cent of the population.

In the Netherlands, which is 5.5 per cent Muslim, 20 per cent of all adult prisoners and 26 per cent of all juvenile prisoners are Muslim.

In Belgium, two per cent of the country is Muslim, mostly from Turkey and Morocco and they comprise 16 per cent of prisoners.

The Perils of Tribalism (RWC)

Tribalism, fervid religiosity, nationalism –all of these forces are at play in the huge, non-monolithic continent that makes up Africa. 

There are lots of countries to worry about for lots of reasons.

The west is locked in struggle with Jihadi warriors who have been shaped by the tribalism of the Islamic Near East, whether it is Waziristan or the Iraqi desert or in Africa.

Sadly, an understanding of tribal structures in Africa has been shunned by the west for a long time even though an understanding of tribalism offers considerable insight.  It is considered a politically incorrect subject and many anthropologists don’t want to talk about it.

“I and my brother against my cousin” was the headline in a recent story on this subject in the Weekly Standard, albeit focusing on the Middle East. 

This was said about a new book by Philip Salzman called Culture and Conflict in the Middle East.  He makes the point that tribes matter most in many parts of the world. 

The dynamics of “honor” and collective responsibility help explain resistance to change in the Middle East, says Salzman.  It seems to me that a weird concept of tribal honor is what enabled a fundamentalist Islamic grocer in the Midwest to stab his young daughter to death, with the help of his wife.  The mother held the high school student down on the kitchen floor for the murder. The girl had sullied the family honor by defying them.  They were upset about her dating an American, a black teenager.  (The father was a terrorism suspect and the FBI, through a hidden bug in the family apartment, recorded the murder as it happened.  The man and wife were shouting, “Die daughter, die,” as they killed her. 

For God’s sake what could possibly explain such behavior?  Tribalism is the best bet.

Zimbabwe's Problems Continue (RWC)

Someone who should be facing the hangman himself for crimes against his own people, but he is not, is Crazy Bob Mugabe, still in power in Zimbabwe.  He most recently has been trying to steal the national election and has been brutalizing the opposition.

He should be swinging from a rope for what he has done to his country and its people over the decades. 

Over the past months he has employed the same vicious methods of terrorizing political opponents.  He lost the recent election but he has busily been obfuscating the numbers, claiming the opposition didn’t receive a majority of 50% of the votes plus one.

He continues to hold on by the tips of his gnarly, 84 year old fingernails through aggressive fraud and violence.

Life in Havana (RWC)

From Havana:  Life under the cross-dressing Raul Castro continues to improve.

Cuban government employees who are retired on pensions, which is much of the population, are going to get a monthly increase in June. That’s the good news.

The bad news is it will be about $1.95 cents.

That brings the average monthly state pension up to around $9.50 cents. 

That’s $9.50 cents… a month. 

And, in the same city, old Robert Vesco caught the “westbound freight”, to use a term once popular with hoboes. He apparently died six months ago from lung cancer in Havana and was buried without fanfare or announcement.  He was a fugitive from the US for many decades.  Remember Investors Overseas Service, IOS ?  Vesco ripped off those investors big-time.

He settled finally in Cuba, one step ahead of US law enforcement and after yachting episodes on the high seas.  He ultimately caught himself in a wringer with Fidel Castro, who had allowed him to operate criminally, until some member of the Castro family got burned.  Vesco ended up doing nine years in a Cuban jail cell for that.  He has been pretty much invisible for the past couple of decades and the Castro regime has said practically nothing about him. He once had a partner named Bernie Cornfeld.  You might remember him, a kind of nutty celebrity while he was at IOS.  He was a very high profile prisoner in Switzerland for a while.  Bernie had a huge house in Beverly Hills in the early 70’s, which he rented.  It was like a castle and had been built by John Barrymore or some other earlier film star.  I went to a couple of parties there. 

Bernie lived quite lavishly with a constantly replenished troop of good looking young women in residence, Playboy Mansion-style.  One of them was the very young Heidi Fleiss, who later famously turned professional.  I don’t actually remember her but, I learned later, she was a main squeeze of Bernie’s and was very young at the time. Bernie’s mother, a nice lady from Brooklyn, lived upstairs in the castle.  Bernie has since also caught the west-bound freight, though he more likely would have said he cashed in his chips.